Canadian Federal Budget Revamp.

Federal Budget Revamp, FY 2025-2026

Today, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne presented his first budget. Mark Carney was elected Prime Minister with a mandate to transform Canada’s economy and reduce its dependence on trade with the United States. The Carney government’s inaugural budget emphasizes structural changes to strengthen the domestic economy and boost non-U.S. exports, and it will be funded by an increase in government debt.

Carney, a former central banker who took office in March, has committed to decreasing reliance on the U.S. by increasing military spending, accelerating infrastructure projects, speeding up housing construction, and enhancing business competitiveness. Given the current large deficits and a rising debt-to-GDP ratio, the government cannot afford higher long-term interest rates. Carney has promised to build a stronger Canada using domestic resources and labour, noting that only 40% of the steel used in Canada is produced domestically, and he intends to change that.

Champagne has cautioned that the public service will need to shrink as the government strives to balance the budget in the coming years. Carney also faces a political challenge in convincing some opposition members to support his budget or at least abstain from voting against it. His Liberal Party caucus is currently three seats short of a majority in the House of Commons, meaning it cannot pass the budget on its own.

Unemployment remains high, economic growth is weak, and exporters, along with business investment, are still struggling due to U.S. tariffs. Carney and Champagne must persuade citizens that jobs, real wages, and living standards will eventually improve if they can stimulate both domestic and foreign investment.

Last week, the Bank of Canada indicated that it is nearing the limit of monetary stimulus it can provide without triggering inflation. Governor Tiff Macklem has consistently stated that he sees fiscal policy as a more effective tool to counter the adverse effects of the trade war, which he perceives as a negative supply shock.

The chart above indicates that Canada not only had the lowest deficit-to-GDP ratio in the G-7 but also among all countries with a triple-A credit rating. However, the rate at which we are issuing net new debt is expected to accelerate over the next year or two. Canada needs to assure the bond market that we will maintain our triple-A credit rating to keep financing costs manageable. Ottawa has divided the budget into two parts: the operating budget and the capital spending budget. The operating budget covers the costs of running the federal government, which includes salaries, wages, rent, and interest payments on the debt. Carney has urged government leaders to review their operating budgets and eliminate unnecessary costs, which include downsizing the federal workforce.

 A similar approach is used in countries like the United Kingdom and New Zealand, as well as by some provinces here at home. In principle, this shift could enhance transparency by allowing a better understanding of how public funds are allocated between day‑to‑day program spending and long‑term investments intended to boost future growth. The capital spending budget is more complex because it’s harder to determine which expenditures will enhance growth and productivity. For instance, while the government is increasing defence spending to meet our NATO obligations, not all of it will contribute to productivity growth. Ottawa’s agenda highlights major infrastructure projects, defence initiatives, housing, significant undertakings like pipelines, enhanced ports, and the development of the Ring of Fire. Federal leadership believes there is a role for industrial policy, as well as measures aimed at broad deregulation and tax competitiveness.

This year’s federal budget projects a deficit of $78.3 billion—nearly double the Liberals’ projection a year ago—prioritizing capital project spending over services. The deficit is expected to decrease gradually to $56.6 billion by 2029-30. Only a year ago, the Liberals forecast a 2025 budget deficit of $42.2 billion, but that was before trade uncertainty and tariff inflation hit our shores with the inauguration of Donald Trump last January. 

The budget presents both downside and upside scenarios. In the downside scenario, ongoing trade uncertainty could worsen the budgetary balance by $9.2 billion annually, while the upside scenario anticipates a $5 billion annual improvement contingent on easing trade uncertainties.

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne emphasized the need for “generational” investments, allocating $25 billion to housing, $30 billion to defence, and $115 billion to infrastructure over the next five years. He criticized proposals to cap the deficit at $42 billion, advocating instead for investments to drive future growth.

The 2025 budget introduces a new format that separates capital and operational spending, with capital investments accounting for 58% of this year’s combined deficit. This shift aims to catalyze $500 billion in private-sector investment. However, we should be skeptical that such animal spirits will materialize quickly, given the immense uncertainty about the future of the Canada-Mexico-US free trade agreement.

The budget pledges to balance operational spending in three years.

Ottawa has been running a “comprehensive expenditure review” to spend less on the day-to-day operations of the federal government. According to the budget, that plan will save $13 billion annually by 2028-29, for a total of $60 billion in savings and revenues over five years.

The budget promises more taxpayer dollars will go toward “nation-building infrastructure, clean energy, innovation, productivity and less on day-to-day operating spending.” This “new discipline” will help protect social benefits, the budget promises.

The public service will see a drop of about 40,000 positions over the coming years. The budget projects it will have 330,000 employees in 2028-29, down from the 368,000 counted last year.

To confront an anemic economic picture, the government says it’s “supercharging growth” and vows to “make Canada’s investment environment more competitive than the U.S.”

To that end, the budget introduces a “productivity super-deduction” tax measure that will allow companies to write off a larger share of capital investments more quickly.

There are also new measures specifically for writing off expenses for manufacturing or processing buildings, as well as a new capital cost allowance for liquefied natural gas (LNG) equipment and related buildings.

Build Baby BuildFast-tracking nation-building projects: In close partnership with provinces, territories, Indigenous Peoples, and private investors, the government is streamlining regulatory approvals and helping to structure financing.

Additional Cuts to Immigration

Selling it as Ottawa “taking back control” over an immigration system that has put pressure on Canada’s housing supply and health-care system, budget 2025 promises to lower admission targets.

The new plan proposes to drastically reduce the target for new temporary resident admissions from 673,650 in 2025 to 385,000 in 2026.

The 2026-28 immigration levels plan would keep permanent resident admission targets at 380,000 per year, down from 395,000 in 2025.

Ending Some High-End Taxes

The government is also proposing to undertake a one-time measure to accelerate the transition of up to 33,000 work permit holders to permanent residency in 2026 and 2027.

“These workers have established strong roots in their communities, are paying taxes and are helping to build the strong economy Canada needs,” the budget notes. 

To fill labour gaps, the Liberals’ plan includes a foreign credential recognition action fund to work with the provinces and territories to improve transparency, timeliness and consistency of foreign credential recognition. 

It would also launch a strategy to attract international talent, including a one-time initiative to recruit over 1,000 highly qualified international researchers to Canada.

In addition, there were billions of dollars in increased defence spending, the details of which are still sketchy. 

Bottom Line

Nothing in this budget is surprising, as most of it has been telegraphed in recent weeks. The budget asserts that “the global trade landscape is changing rapidly, as the United States reshapes its economic relationships and supply chains around the world. The impact is profound—hurting Canadian companies, displacing workers, disrupting supply chains, and creating uncertainty that holds back investment. This level of uncertainty is greater than what we have seen in recent crises. Budget 2025 makes generational investments while maintaining Canada’s strong fiscal advantage—a foundation that allows us to invest ambitiously and responsibly, and build Canada’s economy to be the strongest in the G-7.”

Canada has the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio among the G-7 and one of the smallest deficit-to-GDP ratios. Canada and Germany are the only two G-7 economies rated triple-A, a marker of strong investor confidence which helps keep our borrowing costs as low as possible. This is a time for bold actions to bolster Canada’s competitiveness. We have products the world needs. Hopefully, we can salvage a significant part of the trade agreement with the US, but the odds suggest we build the infrastructure necessary to trade our products worldwide.